RSS

Marketiva Tutorial, Study Marketiva Step by step, Tutorial Forex Trading Step by Step

Introducing a business trading foreign currencies or better known as the Foreign Exchange (FOREX). Marketiva is a broker international, professional and legal in Switzerland, this company has been granted permission to the international no. IBC CAP.291 REG.NO. 646819th

Now through Marketiva you do not need to have more money with a large number of soon to be able to invest in foreign currency trading, but just 10 $, 50$, or up to 70 $ in accordance with the desire and financial ability of your course. Even more extreme is you can immediately make a continental trade without money, because once you're done registering you will be given prizes of U.S. $ 5 as the initial capital.
Not interesting ..? why do not you try it out now ..! all FREE
Investment program is not only suitable for the top, but it is suitable for middle to lower investor. Employees such as, small traders, even for students.

You Receive $5.00 FREE Money to Try Live Forex Trading Today.
Marketiva Start Trading Forex Today With as Little as $1 Dollar. If you ever thought about Forex Trading you will never find a better place to learn than right here at Marketiva plus they pay you $5.00 real money just to open your account and another $10.000 virtual money to practice with.

Marketiva are a Swiss company based in Lausanne and have recently launched their Forex Trading Platform fully integrated with e-currencies. It is a state of the art platform with many advanced features but really user friendly for beginners with 24 hour live support via their onboard chat room.

So join marketiva , you got nothing to loose and lots to gain. Spend some time on the website and you just might surprise yourself by how much you learn and in six months or a year from now you could be trading for a living.

Enjoy Forex Trading in Marketiva, doing Trade from Home or Office. Earn income Us $ 50 - $ 100 per day from Easy Trading, It’s Fun !

join marketivaDownload Streamster Software now, be successful trader in the forex market.
Visit Marketiva website, Open Account Today !

Some Coupon you can use, the codes are the
following:

YSWOB3HKZZ, J2R6AXRLNV, VSX6S0ENVI, JYA1ICKC5C, Z6DBRFTG8C, QJMY64C0KN,
0JQJ0M4Y0G, F6DD2QL4WD, GD7DPMRZBL, IZGF2TV4JJ, 2RBZDKPHAN, EFZUA0UO5G,
6U3K64DQ4K, BZPB2IH62Q, K9HCTD0S96, U8GABP9K5B, 6DSB5K42DN, Y45SQQS09D,
CBO7STQ97U, BEEDD90U5F



STEP-STEP REGISTRATION To Join Marketiva

1.Marketiva Register to the site
Click the banner below to open the official site Marketiva

2. Click on the link "Open an Account" and then the registration form will appear

Fill out the registration form in accordance with the ID that you have

Description:

1. All marked * must be filled;
2. Username: select the name or call you a unique, because this will be used to berchatting Marketiva with the other members;
3. Password in the body of at least 8 characters, to combine with a number;
4. Frist Name: your first name;
5. Midle Initial: initial middle name if you have;
6. Last Name: your last name;
7. Street Address: fill in your address in accordance with ID;
8. City: your city name on the ID;
9. ZIP / Postal Code: Postal Code;
10. State: provinces that you tempati;
11. Country: Select Australia;
12. Phone: enter the house or no telp HP that is still active;
13. E-mail: fill in your email address is still active and there is often use, because each notification and confirmation will be sent to the E-mail address that you fill now;







After you have finished filling the form above, click "Continue". both form and conten




In the "User Template" there are two options, namely "Standard Forex Trader" and "Compact Forex Trader", that is the option to type memeilih Marketiva streamer software. Both the software is basically the same menu - menu just for the "Compact Forex Trader" is much more simple so that it does not take place on the windows.
you select one of the types of software mentioned above.



There are the coupons, where the function of this coupon can be as a discount card, member chat, and many more others. to get the coupon, you can obtain on this site

Coupons can be seen in the bottom of the main web page (see the main page bottom)

For while the "Recovery Question" and "Recovery Answer" please fill in your match that you remember and like, because this will be asked if you forgot your password Marketiva.
Click "Next" to go to the appointment and confirmation with Marketiva
On this page, is a procedural broker to the company's investors. It is a duty to notify the company's risk - the risk of trading in foreign currency so that the Investor does not feel aggrieved if there is a loss so great, and does not require the company because the company only as a facilitator pialan only

Stetment and then on the next, from the Investor that the Investor has its own understanding of all agreements made with Marketiva.

Click "Finish" as a symbol that you agree with the existing agreement. and then you will be direct to the "Get Streamer" to download the software from Marketiva

Click "Streamer TM instalation Package" after that please you install on your computer.

The registration process has been completed.

3.Identity Verivikasi Up

After the registration process is complete, then you have enjoined on to upload data for verivikasi the data you have provided earlier. it aims not to occur because of multiple accounts you can only create one account only. if you do not verivikasi then in a few days your account will be closed.
Data is a need in the Image ID, so you must first scan your ID and berformatkan JPEG.
Example:

1. Image ID: Scan your ID card at the berfoto;
2. Image Address: Scan the ID cards that have lamatnya (must be in accordance with the data)

as notes, scan data is to be colored and each file size of 100kb, so when you scan in the set to be 70 - 100 dpi only.

How verivikasi:

Click here to direct the process to verivikasi Marketiva

after you click the link above you will be asked usernama and password terebih first.
enter the username and password that you've made before, and then click "Login"

Or

Open your email and click on the link for the identification

or

You go with the first site to www.marketiva.com
and enter the Username and Password click the "Login"
click on "Service" on the top-right corner
click on "Identify Yourself" and upload your ID

upload ID: both boxes must be uploaded in the same ID even though ID

4. Running the Program Marketiva has been installed in
After Verivikasi Up finished ID can make trading, after the program is installed, do not do trading or run the program before the Verivikasi ID is made, because the registration must be repeated because at approximately your data is not valid.

Coupon Marketiva

undefined
There are the coupons, where the function of this coupon can be as a discount card, member chat, and many more others. to get the coupon, you can obtain on this site :

Enter a coupon code below, if you can not just empty columns
(coupon code below can be used only once for a username so if the code fails pilh you, try to select the other empty or
Please try)

YSWOB3HKZZ, J2R6AXRLNV, VSX6S0ENVI, JYA1ICKC5C, Z6DBRFTG8C, QJMY64C0KN,
0JQJ0M4Y0G, F6DD2QL4WD, GD7DPMRZBL, IZGF2TV4JJ, 2RBZDKPHAN, EFZUA0UO5G,
6U3K64DQ4K, BZPB2IH62Q, K9HCTD0S96, U8GABP9K5B, 6DSB5K42DN, Y45SQQS09D,
CBO7STQ97U, BEEDD90U5F



Commodities fall as investors cut back on risk, 2010

0 komentar

NEW YORK - Commodities mostly fell again Thursday as investors become more averse to risk and as demand for basic materials wanes.

Prices for copper have been especially hard hit by China's efforts to slow down its economy, Kevin Davitt, a senior market analyst at LaSalle Futures Group said. Rapid growth in China has been an important factor in driving up prices for copper and other commodities recently.

Traders are still on edge about President Barack Obama's plans to restrict trading by big banks and China's move to rein in lending and tighten interest rates. China also has increased the amount of money banks must hold in reserve in an effort to avoid inflation and speculative bubbles.

Copper for March delivery fell 12.45 cents, or 3.9 percent, to settle at $3.098 a pound. The contract has fallen 8.7 percent over the past three days.

April gold dipped 90 cents to settle at $1,084.80 an ounce, while March silver fell 22.8 cents to $16.212 an ounce.

Natural gas dropped for the fourth straight day after a new report showed demand has been weaker than expected. The Energy Information Administration said natural gas supplies dropped by 86 billion cubic feet last week, less than analysts expected. Reserves remain above average for this time of year.

The natural gas contract for March delivery gave up 8.6 cents to settle at $5.138 per 1,000 cubic feet on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Benchmark crude for March delivery fell 3 cents to settle at $73.64 a barrel on the Nymex.

A strengthening dollar is also weighing on commodities. A stronger dollar makes it more expensive for foreign investors to buy commodities. The ICE Futures US dollar index rose 0.2 percent.

Meanwhile, sugar rebounded after a two-day slump and orange juice paused in its climb.

Sugar for March delivery rose 0.64 cents, or 2.3 percent, to settle at 29 cents per pound. Sugar had fallen the last two days after touching a 29-year high earlier in the week. Concerns about supply had pushed prices sharply higher over the past six weeks.

Orange juice prices pulled back a bit after a recent run up. The price of March frozen orange juice concentrate contracts fell 2.85 cents to $1.433 a pound.

Frozen orange juice concentrate prices have been volatile all month as freezing temperatures in Florida a few weeks ago have investors concerned about crop destruction. Analysts say the full damage from the cold snap will not be known for a long time, which has added to the price instability.

Grain prices rose. Wheat for March delivery rose 3.25 cents to settle at $4.87 a bushel and corn rose 3.5 cents to $3.6175 a bushel. Soybeans fell 2.75 cents to $9.3175 a bushel.
Continue Reading...


January 2010 Winners & Losers

0 komentar

U.S. stocks are on track to break a 10-month winning streak this month, closing January 2010 with their worst monthly performance since February 2009.

Since the beginning of the month, NASDAQ Composite is leading the losses, down 4.4%, followed by the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500, falling 3.2% and 3.1% respectively.

Despite a pullback for the major U.S. indices this month, January 2010 is proving better than last year, when the three major averages dropped 6.38% or more.

Historically and on average, the NASDAQ Composite has fared best of the major indexes in January, as it has been up 66% of the time during this month, ranking as its best performing month overall.

What follows is an overview of three major U.S. indices this month in relation to their historical performance, along with a peek at some of the best and worst performing stocks.

Dow [.DJI Loading... () ]

* Currently on track for its worst month since February 2009 when it fell -11.7%
* On track for its worst January since 2009 when it declined -8.8%
* On average, the Dow has gained 0.99% during January and an avg. gain of 0.4% during January when December was a positive month
* Up 64% of the time in January, with an average gain of 3.6% when up, and down 36% of the time with an average loss of -3.7%
* The Best January was on 1976, when it rose 14.4%
* The Worst January was on 2009, when it fell -8.8%

S&P 500 [SPX Loading... () ]

* Currently on track for its worst month since February 2009 when it lost -10.9%
* On track for its worst January since 2009 when it declined -8.6%
* On average, the S&P has gained 1.3% during January, and an avg. gain of 0.6% during January when December was a positive month
* Up 64% of the time in January, with an average gain of 4.2% when up, and down 36% of the time with an average loss of -3.9%
* The Best January was on 1987, when it rose 13.2%
* The Worst January was on 2009, when it fell -8.6%

NASDAQ [COMP Loading... () ]

* Currently on track for its worst month since February 2009 when it lost -6.7%
* On track for its worst January since 2009 when it declined -6.4%
* On average, the NASDAQ Composite has gained 2.87% during January, and an avg. gain of 2.9% during January when December was a positive month
* Up 66% of the time in January, with an average gain of 6.6% when up, and down 34% of the time with an average loss of -4.2%
* The Best January was on 1975, when it rose 16.7%
* The Worst January was on 2008, when it fell -9.9%
Continue Reading...


BlackRock earnings soar, get ETF jolt

0 komentar

NEW YORK, Jan 28 (Reuters) - BlackRock Inc's (BLK.N) fourth-quarter earnings more than quadrupled as the world's biggest asset manager rebounded from the recession and gave investors an indication of the jolt it may get from its move into exchange-traded funds.

The Dec. 1 acquisition of Barclays Global Investors turned BlackRock, historically a fixed-income money management firm, into a leader in exchange-traded funds.

The deal generated more revenue than expected in December, and BlackRock had strong overall fund flows in the quarter, said Jeffrey Hopson, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co.

Fourth-quarter net income rose to $256 million, or $1.62 a share, from $52 million, or 39 cents a share, a year earlier.

Excluding special items, profit was $2.39 a share. On that basis, the results surpassed analysts' average forecast of $2.10, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Revenue rose 45 percent to $1.54 billion, including $278 million in fees generated from BGI in December, the company said.

With $3.3 trillion in assets under management, BlackRock now manages more money than the entire hedge fund industry following the BGI deal.

"This was a very strong quarter," said Timothy Ghriskey, a co-founder of Solaris Group, an investment firm that does not have a position in BlackRock shares. "They did have very good flow of new assets. But a big chunk of it was in passive equities, which is low margin."

In the quarter, BlackRock reported net inflows of $39.73 billion, which included roughly $17 billion in equities, $17 billion into equities and $1.3 billion in hedge funds and other alternative investments. There were also $422 million going into cash management products.

The company also provided an estimate for what net inflows would have looked like in the quarter if BlackRock had closed on the BGI acquisition in September.

On a pro forma basis, BlackRock said net inflows would have totaled $82 billion with index equity products bringing in $46 billion and the firm's bread-and-butter bond business taking in $42.9 billion.

In acquiring BGI, New York-based BlackRock added 3,500 employees and now has more staff in London than anywhere else in the world. The transaction also helped expand BlackRock's investor base.

BlackRock reported earnings a day before several top fund companies, including Janus Capital Group Inc (JNS.N), T. Rowe Price (TROW.O) and Invescco (IVZ.N), are due to report quarterly results. Those companies' fund businesses have some overlap with BlackRock's, but BlackRock is generally much more institutional in orientation.

STRONG OVERSEAS BUSINESS

Chief Executive Officer Laurence Fink said in a conference call that about 40 percent of the firm's business comes from outside the United States, a marked change from a few years ago.

While Fink said "merger integrations are hard," he added that the company's plan to offer investors a broad array of stock and bond investments is on target.

In January, BlackRock saw more money than expected move into its ETF products, he said.

The trend is for money to move out of ETFs in the first quarter of the year. Fink said he is not sure if what BlackRock is seeing in January with ETFs will continue into February and March.

BlackRock incurred $152 million in added expenses in the fourth quarter because of the BGI deal and the integration of the ETF business. Fourth-quarter operating expenses totaled $1.16 billion, up from $726 million a year earlier.

BlackRock's strong earnings came two days after the asset manager suffered a black eye for a misstep in a multibillion-dollar commercial real estate venture.

On Monday, BlackRock and Tishman Speyer Properties agreed to give creditors control of New York City's Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village housing complex. [ID:nN25170135]

The Tishman-BlackRock group bought the complex for $5.4 billion in 2006; the property is now valued at $2 billion or less. Earlier this month the group defaulted on $4.4 billion of debt used to finance the purchase.

In Wednesday's conference call, analysts did not bring up the Stuyvesant matter. But Fink addressed it in an opening statement, calling it a mistake and saying the company is not perfect.

The BlackRock Solutions business took on 14 new assignments in the fourth quarter. The unit has emerged as a major adviser to the U.S. Federal Reserve on a number of government bailouts, including the controversial rescue package for American International Group (AIG.N).

BlackRock said the new jobs for BlackRock Solutions reflect a continued focus on risk management by investors and institutions.

BlackRock shares closed up $2.06 at $225.19 on Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange.
Continue Reading...


CANADA STOCKS-TSX lower as credit worries drag down miners

0 komentar

TORONTO, Jan 28 (Reuters) - Toronto's main stock index fell on Wednesday with the heavily weighted materials sector pulled down by concerns about the global economic recovery and demand for key commodities.

The TSX's mining sub-sector was the biggest drag on the market, tumbling more than a 3 percent.

Teck Resources (TCKb.TO) led the slide, falling 5.7 percent to C$36.50, as industrial metals tumbled to multi-week lows on persistent worries over monetary tightening in China and uncertainty over U.S. plans to limit banks' risk-taking. [MET/L]

"You really need that China card to play out ... no one had it in their head that the Chinese really want to slow down their economy," said Paul Gardner, partner and portfolio manager at Avenue Investment Management.

"Overall, the commodities have had a run and there's going to be real pressure on them on the downside -- selling pressure," said Gardner.

At 12:05 p.m. (1705 GMT) the Toronto Stock Exchange's S&P/TSX composite index .GSPTSE was down 39.48 points, or 0.35 percent, at 11,321.71.

Gold and oil prices were lower as the U.S. dollar hit a six-month high against the euro on concerns over Greece's fiscal problems and ahead of a Federal Reserve interest rate decision. [GOL/][O/R].

Shares of EnCana (ECA.TO), Canada's biggest natural gas producer, were down 1.9 percent at C$33.13, while Kinross Gold, was down 2.5 percent at C$18.02.

Canadian National Railway (CNR.TO) led the industrials down, sliding 0.7 percent to C$55.30, despite reporting late on Tuesday it is aiming for 10 percent earnings growth in 2010 and raising its dividend. [ID:nN25105294]

Investors had been looking for more signs of revenue growth as opposed to strictly cost-cutting to boost the bottom line, said Gardner.

He added that CN, which helps ship commodities and grains to China, will also be pressured by concerns that demand could weaken in the world's fastest growing major economy.
Continue Reading...


FACTBOX-US banks' commodity risks still below 2008 highs

0 komentar

Jan 28 (Reuters) - Wall Street banks involved in proprietary trading of
commodities are taking less risk than they did before the financial crisis,
even though markets are up sharply from the recession's lows.

Financial data for the fourth quarter from U.S. banks such as JPMorgan
Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley show their Value-at-Risk, or VaR, for
commodities at least 25 percent below levels employed during the height of the
commodities boom, the third quarter of 2008.

VaR figures basically represent the money a financial institution is
willing to risk, or the confidence level it has in trading a particular market,
in a day.

Combined earnings from fixed income, commodities and currency products at
the banks have rebounded from the lows of the financial crisis. Goldman, in
particular, reported record high FICC earnings in the second and third quarters
of 2009.

U.S. banks' VaR for commodities (in $ millions):

-- 2009 -- -- 2008 --

Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
*i Goldman Sachs (GS.N) 38 27 40 40 38 51 48 38
*ii JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N) 26 38 34 28 30 41 31 28
*iii Morgan Stanley (MS.N) 23 25 23 26 27 33 38 39
*i Potential loss in a day with a 95 pct confidence level
*ii Potential loss in a day with a 99 pct confidence level
*iii Potential loss in a day with a 95 pct confidence level

U.S. banks' combined earnings from fixed income, commodities and currency
products (in $ billions):

------ 2009------- -------- 2008 ----------

Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Goldman Sachs 3.9 6.0 6.8 6.6 -3.4 1.6 2.4 3.1
JPMorgan Chase 2.7 5.0 4.9 4.9 -1.7 0.82 2.3 0.47
Morgan Stanley 0.32 0.24 0.4 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.21 0.28
BankofAmerica (BAC.N) 1.3 3.99 2.68 4.79 -5.4 -0.41 0.86 -1.6
Citigroup (C.N) 1.8 3.95 5.57 10.22 0.47 4.76 4.44 4.73
Continue Reading...


WORLD FOREX 2010 : Global Growth Concerns Help Dollar, Yen

0 komentar

LONDON --Concern about global growth remained the dominant factor in currencies, helping the dollar and the yen to head higher in Europe Wednesday.

The euro, meanwhile, continued to sink as Portugal's latest budget plans failed to convince investors of the country's ability to rein in its budget deficit.

All the same, the moves in major currencies were limited ahead of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting that ends later in the day, just in case the Fed indicates a more upbeat assessment of economic recovery.

Analysts say they will look in
Continue Reading...


FTSE hits five-week low as commodities, banks sag

0 komentar

LONDON, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Britain's top share index dropped 1.1 percent early on Wednesday as miners and energy stocks fell on lower commodity prices and investors waited for the end of a U.S. Federal Reserve policy meeting.

By 0920 GMT the FTSE 100 .FTSE was down 56.07 points at 5,220.78, touching its lowest level since Dec. 21 after it gained 0.3 percent the previous session, snapping a four-session losing streak.

Miners were the heaviest drag on the index with metal prices slipping as the outlook for demand was clouded by China's heightened efforts to rein in soaring credit growth, a factor which helped push Asian stocks lower for a ninth day.

Rio Tinto (RIO.L), Xstrata (XTA.L), Lonmin (LMI.L), Anglo American (AAL.L), Kazakhmys (KAZ.L) and BHP Billiton (BLT.L) fell 1.5 to 3.9 percent.

"The bad news that allegedly sparked the fall was China moving the reserve ratio, but that was just the implementation of what was announced last week so it shows that the market has got a bit nervous," said Steven Bell, director at hedge fund GLC."

China's largest bank ICBC, said on Wednesday it has stopped rolling over some loans after a surge in credit at the start of the year, in the latest evidence that banks may finally be heeding a government-directed clampdown.

There were nerves ahead of the conclusion of the latest two-day Federal Reserve Open Market Committee meeting, although a decision on U.S. interest rates and the central bank's quantitative easing policy is not due until after the London close, at 1915 GMT. [ID:nN26106537]

Energy stocks were also a significant weight on the index as crude oil held below $75 per barrel CLc1.

BG Group (BG.L), BP (BP.L), Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) fell 0.8 to 1.9 percent. But Tullow Oil (TLW.L) was the standout loser, down 4.8 percent after it launched a $1.6 billion share sale to pay for the development of assets in Uganda.

Banks, sensitive to shifts in investor sentiment, were also broadly lower. Barclays (BARC.L), HSBC (HSBA.L), Standard Chartered (STAN.L), Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.L) and Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY.L) fell 2 to 3.8 percent.

Hedge fund manager Man Group (EMG.L) was also a big blue- chip faller, down 4.9 percent, as Credit Suisse cut its price target and estimates and its flagship AHL Diversified fund posted a 3.6 percent fall over the past week.

Vodafone (VOD.L), seen as having sound defensive qualities, was one of the few stocks in positive territory, up 0.4 percent.

Johnson Matthey (JMAT.L) outperformed, off 0.7 percent after the platinum specialist reported strong third-quarter results with profits before tax 20 percent higher than in the third quarter last year.

Ahead of the FOMC decision, a batch of U.S. economic indicators should attract interest, with the latest weekly mortgage and refinancing indexes due for release at 1330 GMT, followed by December new home sales at 1500 GMT.

The only British data likely to be of interest on Wednesday will be the January CBI distributive trades survey, set for release at 1100 GMT.

Ex-dividend factors knocked 0.64 points off the FTSE 100 index on Wednesday, with contract caterer Compass Group (CPG.L) the only company losing its payout attractions.
Continue Reading...


Mobius Says China Lending Curbs May Benefit Economy

0 komentar

Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- China’s lending slowdown may benefit the domestic economy by reducing risk and investors should still buy shares of the nation’s banks, investor Mark Mobius said.

“I don’t see a slowdown in lending as a bad thing,” Mobius, who oversees about $34 billion in emerging markets funds as chairman of Templeton Asset Management Ltd., said in an interview at a conference in Sydney today. “It moderates risk to some degree because people don’t go overboard.”

Chinese banks have begun restricting new loans, responding to a push by regulators to contain credit after a surge in lending in the first half of this month, according to people familiar with the situation. That’s stoking concern a clampdown on lending to curb inflation and asset price speculation will slow growth in the world’s third-largest economy.

Recent gains by Chinese stocks had been overdone, while local banks have yet to tap fully potential demand for individual loans, Mobius said. The Shanghai Composite Index has dropped as much as 23 percent from a 14-month high set in August, after having doubled from its November 2008 low. The measure is currently 14 percent below last year’s peak.

China’s stocks offer a “buying opportunity” after the Shanghai Composite Index dropped below 3,000 for the first time since October, Morgan Stanley’s China strategist Jerry Lou said. The benchmark Shanghai index lost 1.1 percent to 2,986.61.

‘Early Stage’

“If China is tightening at an early stage, it reduces the risk of global inflation from increasing earlier and the Fed from tightening earlier,” Lou, 36, said in a phone interview from New York. “I’m a lot more worried about a U.S. tightening than China tightening.”

At JPMorgan Chase & Co., analysts are turning “less bullish” on emerging-market stocks in the first half of 2010 amid concern central banks will tighten monetary policy to combat faster inflation.

“China led the recovery and is now leading the tightening cycle,” analysts led by Adrian Mowat wrote. “We are now less bullish on the first-half performance as investors price in policy uncertainty.”

Bank of China Ltd. has stopped extending new corporate loans in the Shanghai area, said a person familiar with the matter who declined to be identified. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., the nation’s biggest lender, said today it will keep lending. The Beijing-based bank said in a statement that loan growth was “relatively fast” in the first half of January and has since “stabilized.”

More Spending

“The market was due for a correction,” Mobius said. “I don’t see the start of a huge bear market any time soon. As the Chinese get more into spending rather than saving, the banks will do very well. The consumer market really has just scratched the surface.”

Global equities tumbled last week after higher-than- expected economic growth in China fueled concern that borrowing costs will rise to prevent the economy from overheating.

Gross domestic product expanded 10.7 percent while consumer prices rose a higher-than-estimated 1.9 percent in December from a year earlier, according to government data.

Every major stock index tracked globally by Bloomberg has fallen this year, amid proposed crackdowns by the U.S. on the banking industry and unwinding of government stimulus measures worldwide. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index, which jumped 75 percent in 2009, the most since annual records began in 1988, has dropped 5.8 percent this year.

No Volcker Repeat

China’s monetary tightening is likely to be more gradual than this month’s stock sell-off reflects, and the economic rebound will be sustained this year, said Stephen Jen of BlueGold Capital Management LLP.

“The kind of tightening we are seeing in China is appropriate and will not be a repeat of what Volcker did while he was the Fed Chairman,” Jen, managing director of currencies and macroeconomics at BlueGold in London, wrote in a report late yesterday. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker’s attack on inflation in the early 1980s tipped the U.S. into a recession.

China’s central bank also has raised the ratio for deposits banks must set aside as reserves and guided bill yields higher this month.

“I am starting to think that some investors simply don’t understand China, even though they feel they do,” said Jen, the former head of foreign exchange research at Morgan Stanley, who has previously worked at the International Monetary Fund. “It is highly unlikely, in my opinion, that Beijing will drive the economy into a growth recession just to contain inflation.”

Biggest Risks

The three biggest risks to China are the country’s reliance on demand for its exports, the supply of money, and potential losses by companies, in China and overseas, from derivatives, Mobius said today in Sydney.

China has pegged the yuan at about 6.83 per dollar since July 2008 to help exporters weather a global recession, rebuffing calls from U.S. and European officials to allow the market to set the exchange rate.

“There is a tendency for them not to listen to their trade partners,” he said. “The amount of foreign exchange they’ve built up creates a problem. This is building up a lot of tension. The Chinese will have to look to be more flexible towards the yuan.”

Mobius said Jan. 25 in Bangkok that he still doesn’t believe there’s a property bubble in China. He had said Jan. 7 he’s buying shares of Chinese developers because consumer demand will increase and government efforts won’t hurt economic growth.

Property Prices

Property prices in 70 cities across China climbed 7.8 percent in December, the fastest pace in 18 months, a government report showed this month. China’s property sales jumped 75.5 percent to 4.4 trillion yuan last year, led by the eastern cities of Zhejiang and Shanghai, the National Bureau of Statistics said in a Jan. 19 statement.

China’s property-market data may be masking the degree that speculation is driving prices in some of the larger cities, a World Bank economist said on Jan. 25. Only some areas in the Chinese economy are overheating, such as the Shanghai property market, Mobius said.

“There’s too much demand, not enough supply,” he said in a speech after the interview. “If you travel around the country, this is not the average situation.”

Mobius also said the price of commodities, including some precious metals, will climb. Metals prices fell today on concern that China’s measures to curb economic growth may hurt demand.

“Commodities are going to continue their upward trend,” he said. “I’m a big fan of palladium. It may even outpace platinum.”
Continue Reading...


Global stocks hit again by tight money fears, regulation, 2010

0 komentar

LONDON (Reuters) - Global stock markets fell again on Wednesday, hitting their lowest in two months as investors fretted about a monetary squeeze from central banks around the world and also the impact of tightening U.S. banking regulation.

European markets lost 1.5 percent in early trading and followed a 9th straight loss for Asia stocks on continued reverberations over China's credit tightening this week.

Investors were also on edge as the U.S. Federal Reserve was due to end its latest two-day policy meeting later in the day.

While the meeting is expected to yield little in terms of a near-term policy shift, traders will scour its statement for clues on when it may wind down its policy of quantitative easing -- effectively money printing via purchases of bonds.

What is more, the meeting is taking place amid a fierce Senate debate over whether Chairman Ben Bernanke should be appointed for a second term, another factor weighing on investor confidence this week.

There were also concerns about the intensifying regulatory backlash against U.S. and global banks, captured by U.S. President Barack Obama's latest proposals to limit the size of banks, their proprietary trading and their links to hedge funds.

"There are worries about the Fed phasing out quantitative easing," said Bernard McAlinden, investment strategist at NCB Stockbrokers. "There are also still worries about Obama's plans for banks, and Chinese growth."

"We're well into a major correction now, and this is about as big as most corrections get. The outlook is for some sideways trading," he said.

Banks continued to fuel the heat of the market retreat.

Spain's second-largest bank, BBVA fell 4 percent after posting a 16.1 percent decline in 2009 net profit to 4.21 billion euros ($5.9 billion) as the impact of the global downturn forced it to make more provisions.

Other banks to fall included BNP Paribas, Banco Santander, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and UBS, down between 1.5 and 2.6 percent.

U.S. stocks slipped late on Tuesday due to trepidation over churning political and regulatory developments, offsetting solid earnings and improved consumer confidence data.

The S&P 500 closed 0.4 percent lower and futures prices pointed to a resumption of the decline later.

ASIA, EMERGING MARKETS RATTLED

Risk aversion everywhere was heightened by regulatory concerns, China tightening, the Fed meeting and sovereign debt worries in Greece and elsewhere.

The premium investors demand to hold 10-year Greek government bonds rather than benchmark German Bunds jumped to a euro lifetime high after the Greek finance ministry said there was no deal to sell bonds to China.

Ten-year Greek bonds yielded as much as 332 basis points over German Bunds, up 28 basis points on the day, after the comments denying press reports Greek planned to sell about 25 billion euros of its debt to China.

"They've denied the China sale story and that was the only thing that was keeping the market in," said a trader in London.

Emerging market stocks, meantime, dropped 0.65 percent to two-month lows.

The dollar rose 0.2 percent and the yen gained broadly on Wednesday as investors shied from riskier assets.

"Concerns over China and Greece are still in the background. The uncertainty all this suggests is likely to keep risk on the back foot," said Gavin Friend, currency strategist at National Australia Bank.

"Equities have further to go on the downside and the period of pessimism can continue."

By 0930 GMT, the euro was down slightly against the dollar at 1.4050 and was down 0.5 percent at 125.50 yen after hitting a 9-month low of 125.25 yen earlier.

Euro zone government bonds yields were flat.
Continue Reading...


4th UPDATE: New York Outpaces London In Forex Volume Recovery 2010

0 komentar

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Foreign-exchange trading volume is growing faster in New York than in London, according to data released Monday, although the U.K. capital remains by far the leader in currency trade.

The data, compiled semiannually by central banks from the major foreign exchange trading centers around the world, show trading in currencies picked up steam globally as the economic recovery took hold.

London saw average daily volumes of $1.549 trillion in currencies traded in October, a 14% rise on April 2009, the month of the previous survey, according to the Bank of England. This ...
Continue Reading...


Regional-Bank ETFs Cash In

0 komentar

Exchange-traded funds that invest in regional-banking stocks have outperformed the broad financial sector in 2010 on hopes that smaller lenders' credit losses are easing and that they will be affected less by potential financial regulation.

The SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF (trading symbol: KRE) is up 8.6% this year, while the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index is down 1.6%.

Regional banks also have jumped ahead of the general financial sector in a trend that has emerged in recent months. The regional-banking ETF gained 15% for the three months ended Jan. 25, compared with a loss of 5.6% for the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), a barometer of large-cap financial shares, according to FactSet Research.

The performance divergence was on display last Thursday when the Obama administration unveiled proposals designed to curb risk in the financial system. The president proposed new rules to limit the size of some banks and their trading activity.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed more than 200 points Thursday on concerns potential regulation could hurt profits at big banks that generate sizable revenue from trading with their own capital. The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund dropped about 3%, but the regional-bank ETF rallied 3%.

Regional banks got a lift from upbeat earnings reports from KeyCorp, Fifth Third Bancorp and others. They also held up better because they don't have trading and investment-banking businesses that could take a hit from more financial regulation, unlike larger peers.

Regional-banking stocks have seen significant performance swings relative to big lenders and the overall financial sector during the credit turmoil of the past two years.

Regional banks didn't fall as hard in 2008 because they had less exposure to subprime mortgages and other risky securities relative to big banks, which saw their stocks decimated. The SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF lost 18% in 2008, while the Financial Select ETF fell 55%, according to research firm Morningstar. The situation was reversed in 2009, as regional banks lagged behind on fears over losses in commercial real estate, before the pendulum swung back.

That is why a call in early December from Credit Suisse analysts looks prescient. In a Dec. 2 note, analysts led by Craig Siegenthaler advised investors to buy the stocks ahead of fourth-quarter results, which started being announced last week.

The bullish view was based on the forecast that nonperforming assets, charge-offs and provisions for credit losses would improve in 2010. Credit Suisse predicted most regional banks wouldn't need to raise capital, although many have yet to pay back the money they borrowed from the government under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

"Specifically, we expect provisions to peak in the fourth quarter of 2009, as reserve builds decline into mid-2010," the analysts wrote.

Aside from improving credit trends in commercial and residential real estate, other analysts have pointed to attractive valuations in many regional banks despite their recent outperformance.

The top five holdings in the SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF, according to State Street Global Advisors, are CVB Financial, Fulton Financial, Boston Private Financial Holdings, MB Financial and FirstMerit.
Continue Reading...


Stocks Halt Slide

0 komentar

Wall Street drew a deep sigh of relief Monday as U.S. stocks posted modest gains, interrupting a big slide that accelerated late last week with the president's plan to curtail bank size and trading. Financial shares were among the winners in the session after dropping fast in recent days as investors fear the new bank rules could mean an end to the era of big risk-taking and big profits. Apple announced that the holiday season of 2009 was its most profitable quarter ever.

The major indexes lost some early gains in the morning but rallied again in the afternoon. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 24 points, or .2%, to 10,197 while the S&P 500 was up five points, or .5%, to 1,097. The Nasdaq gained six points, or .3%, to 2,211.
Yahoo! Buzz

An accounting change helped Apple ( AAPL - news - people ) report that its profit in the last three months of 2009 was up 50% from 2008 and sales grew by a third thanks to Christmas shoppers who snatched up iPhones and iPods at discounted prices. Apple earned $3.67 a share, far better than the $1.78 analysts had forecast, but shares sank 1.1% after the bell after rising sharply during regular trading.

Also announcing earnings Monday, AK Steel Holding Corp. ( AKS - news - people ) flipped to a fourth quarter profit from a big loss the year before. The steel industry has been on the mend since the recession, though prices are down from a year ago. AK Steel made 36 cents a share, compared to analyst estimates of 20 cents a share. Sales fell 9% but exceeded Wall Street expectations. Shares jumped 5.4%.

Oil services giant Halliburton ( HAL - news - people ) beat analyst estimates by a penny with 28 cents a share in fourth quarter profit, down sharply from the year before. Sales fell by 25% but investors were expecting bad news and Halliburton shares lost just .3%.

A halt to stock market declines boosted raw materials prices with metals and oil benefitting. Gold rose toward $1,100 an ounce while crude oil settled above $75 a barrel. A sinking U.S. dollar also helped commodities markets gain.
Reader Comments
Post a Comment

General Motors said Monday that chief executive Ed Whitacre will take over permanently. Whitacre, who once led AT&T ( T - news - people ), was the Detroit auto maker's interim chief. Whitacre said GM will repay $8.1 billion in loans from the U.S. and Canadian governments as soon as June.

Short-term government debt yields fell to a two-week low on Monday as wary investos snatched up the ultra-safe instruments at an auction. The U.S. Treasury sold $23 billion in three-month bills at a yield of less than .06%.
Continue Reading...


Regional-bank ETFs sidestep recent financial-sector carnage

0 komentar

BOSTON (MarketWatch) -- Exchange-traded funds that invest in regional-banking stocks have outperformed the broad financial sector so far in 2010 on hopes that smaller lenders' credit losses are easing and that they'll be affected less by potential financial regulation.

Through Jan. 21, the SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF /quotes/comstock/13*!kre/quotes/nls/kre (KRE 24.35, -0.58, -2.33%) was up about 12% year-to-date, while the overall market as measured by the S&P 500 Index /quotes/comstock/21z!i1:in\x (SPX 1,092, -24.72, -2.21%) was roughly flat.

Regional banks also have jumped ahead of the general financial sector in a trend that's emerged in recent months. The regional-banking ETF gained 22.3% for the three months ended Jan. 21, compared with a loss of 1.1% for the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund /quotes/comstock/13*!xlf/quotes/nls/xlf (XLF 14.18, -0.48, -3.26%) , a barometer of large-cap financial shares that's stuffed with large-cap bank stocks, according to investment researcher Morningstar. See recent column on XLF.
/quotes/comstock/13*!kre/quotes/nls/kre KRE 24.35, -0.58, -2.33%


The performance divergence was on display last Thursday when the Obama administration unveiled proposals designed to curb risk in the financial system after the credit meltdown. The president proposed new rules to limit the size of "too-big-to-fail" banks and crack down on their trading activity. Read related story on international financial-stability group backing Obama's bank plan.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average /quotes/comstock/10w!i:dji/delayed (INDU 10,173, -216.90, -2.09%) shed more than 200 points on Thursday on concerns potential regulation could hurt profits at big banks that generate sizable revenue from trading in the markets with their own capital. The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund lost about 3%, but the regional-bank ETF rallied 3% despite the carnage.

Regional banks got a lift from upbeat earnings reports from KeyCorp /quotes/comstock/13*!key/quotes/nls/key (KEY 7.25, -0.09, -1.23%) , Fifth Third Bancorp /quotes/comstock/15*!fitb/quotes/nls/fitb (FITB 12.10, +0.08, +0.67%) and others. They also held up better because they don't have trading and investment-banking businesses that could take a hit from more financial regulation, unlike their larger peers.

Regional-banking stocks have seen significant performance swings relative to giant lenders and the overall financial sector during the credit turmoil of the past two years.

Regional banks didn't fall as hard in 2008 because they had less exposure to subprime mortgages and other risky securities relative to big banks, which saw their stocks decimated. The SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF lost 18.4% in 2008, while the larger-cap SPDR KBW Bank ETF /quotes/comstock/13*!kbe/quotes/nls/kbe (KBE 22.96, -0.71, -3.00%) fell 47.2%, according to Morningstar.

However, the situation reversed in 2009 as regionals lagged the resurgent financial sector on fears over losses in commercial real estate. Recently, however, the pendulum has swung back in favor of regional banks.
Earnings and credit losses

That's why a call in early December from Credit Suisse analysts to overweight the regional-banking sector looks prescient. In a Dec. 2 note, analysts led by Craig Siegenthaler advised investors to buy the stocks ahead of the fourth-quarter results that crossed the wires last week.

The bullish view was based on the forecast that nonperforming assets, charge-offs and provisions for credit losses would steadily improve in 2010. Credit Suisse predicted most regional banks would not need to raise capital, although many have yet to pay back the money they borrowed from the government under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

"Specifically, we expect provisions to peak in the fourth quarter of 2009, as reserve builds decline into mid-2010," the analysts wrote.

Aside from improving credit trends in commercial and residential real estate, other analysts have pointed to attractive valuations in many regional banks despite their recent outperformance.

Indexed portfolios such as SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF allow investors to take a view on regional banks without picking individual stocks.
/quotes/comstock/13*!iat/quotes/nls/iat IAT 22.72, -0.47, -2.03%


However, investors should note that the ETF's tracking index is equal-weighted, which leads to some unique wrinkles. The benchmark for the iShares Dow Jones U.S. Regional Banks Index Fund /quotes/comstock/13*!iat/quotes/nls/iat (IAT 22.72, -0.47, -2.03%) , meanwhile, weights stocks by their market cap.

Therefore, the SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF has a greater tilt to small-cap regional banks, says Scott Burns, Morningstar's director of ETF analysis.

"If regional banks are performing well then the small-cap portion does even better," he said.

The SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF has nearly doubled the performance of its cap-weighted competitor over the past three months.

The top five holdings in the SPDR KBW Regional Banking ETF, according to State Street Global Advisors, are CVB Financial Corp. /quotes/comstock/15*!cvbf/quotes/nls/cvbf (CVBF 9.95, -0.24, -2.36%) , Fulton Financial Corp. /quotes/comstock/15*!fult/quotes/nls/fult (FULT 9.07, -0.74, -7.54%) , Boston Private Financial Holdings Inc. /quotes/comstock/15*!bpfh/quotes/nls/bpfh (BPFH 7.14, -0.85, -10.64%) , MB Financial Inc. /quotes/comstock/15*!mbfi/quotes/nls/mbfi (MBFI 21.65, -0.71, -3.18%) and FirstMerit Corp. /quotes/comstock/15*!fmer/quotes/nls/fmer (FMER 22.47, -0.51, -2.22%) .

The biggest stocks in the iShares Dow Jones U.S. Regional Banks Index Fund are U.S. Bancorp /quotes/comstock/13*!usb/quotes/nls/usb (USB 24.67, -0.47, -1.87%) , PNC Financial Services Group /quotes/comstock/13*!pnc/quotes/nls/pnc (PNC 53.62, -2.08, -3.73%) , BB&T Corp. /quotes/comstock/13*!bbt/quotes/nls/bbt (BBT 28.15, -0.93, -3.20%) , Northern Trust Corp. /quotes/comstock/15*!ntrs/quotes/nls/ntrs (NTRS 52.07, -1.44, -2.69%) and SunTrust Banks Inc. /quotes/comstock/13*!sti/quotes/nls/sti (STI 24.55, +0.02, +0.08%)
Continue Reading...


Grains Week Ahead-Grains may slide on Obama bank plan 2010

0 komentar

CHICAGO, Jan 25 - Traders this week will deal with new bearish input for grain prices in the wake of President Barack Obama's plans to limit banks' financial risk-taking that could dent demand for commodities.

"The Obama news is only a proposal, it's not law but I think there is some selling because of that," said Vic Lespinasse, an analyst for GrainAnalyst.com.

Chicago Board of Trade corn futures prices have already plunged 14 percent, or nearly 60 cents a bushel, over the past two weeks. Wheat is down 12-1/2 percent and soy off 6 percent.

Each may fall further as the market becomes more skittish about potential government involvement and on signs global grain and oilseed supplies keep building.

"I think we're in no-man's land right now. There could be a short-term recovery this week, but long-term it's bearish with a huge South American soybean crop coming on and increased acres here of both corn and soy," said Joe Bedore, CBOT trading floor manager for trade house FC Stone.

"The Obama issue, if you believe it will happen, would break up banks, but I think the individual parts would still trade, so I don't think it's all that bearish," Bedore said.

Investment banking has been at the center of the U.S. economic firestorm and on Thursday, President Obama ratcheted up his combative stance toward Wall Street by rolling out a plan aiming to prevent U.S. banks from becoming "to big to fail." [ID:nN21219073] [ID:nN21658127] [ID:nLDE60L18M]

Buying of commodities by the likes of Goldman Sachs (GS.N), the biggest bank in commodities, and J.P. Morgan (JPM.N), the second-biggest commodities trader, has been blamed for driving crude oil and grains to record highs in 2008. [ID:nLDE60L18M]

Grain prices already were skidding downhill before Obama dropped his bombshell on the financial and commodity markets.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's January crop report released nearly two weeks ago was still sending shivers through the market. USDA said last year's corn and soy crops were bigger than most people expected and at a record high.

The report also showed a supply buildup in America this year for each crop, with wheat supplies the largest in 20 years and projected record-South American soy production for 2010.

As the short-term supply/demand outlook turned bearish the long-term outlook also is beginning to look murky as farmers in the United States turn away from crops such as wheat to plant corn and soybeans.

Trade sources on Friday said influential Memphis-based analysts Informa Economics forecast 2010 U.S. corn production at 89.6 million, up more than 3 million acres, or up 3-1/2 percent, from last year's 86.5 million, and soy acreage at 77.9 million, nearly a million higher from 2009's 77.0 million.

"We've lost about 20 million acres of winter wheat in the past 20 years, everyone is turning to corn and soybeans away from wheat," Lespinasse said.

USDA's winter wheat seedings report showed a reduction in U.S. wheat seedings to the lowest area in 97 years.
Continue Reading...


A false dilemma In the 'ETF or mutual fund?' debate, investors miss the point

0 komentar

BOSTON -- It was an ordinary press release that was largely ignored by the media, but the recent announcement of a new trade group for the exchange-traded fund industry sends a clear signal about what's next in the evolution of ETFs and how they're viewed by the public.

The new ETF Council Inc. is a non-profit trade association for an $800 billion sub-segment of the fund industry. The Council is being formed by Irving Strauss, the most veteran media maven in the industry, a sprightly 89-year-old who is no stranger to building an industry group from an emerging idea.
Investment strategies for 2010

Oscar Schafer, managing partner at O.S.S. Capital Management and Barron's Roundtable members, sees inexpensive opportunities in the market.

A half century ago, Strauss created an organization that morphed its way through several different identities, but which acted as the trade association for no-load mutual funds. At the time, the public was not particularly knowledgeable about funds, and was under the impression that issues sold without a sales charge must be missing something.

Over time, the group splintered, with much of the focus changing from investing directly and without sales charges to investing smart and with a close eye on costs. The Mutual Fund Education Alliance that grew from that effort is a coalition of funds that continues its efforts to make investors smarter. The last incarnation of Strauss' original group, the 100% No-Load Mutual Fund Council, disbanded in May 2000.

Over the years, however, the public perception of the argument changed. At first, the group tried to convince consumers there was nothing wrong with funds that had no sales charges. Then, it became that funds without sales charges were better than funds with sales loads. Ultimately, the public recognized that the structure of sales charges is less important than the quality of investment management, and that total costs -- whether they come in loads, expense ratios or fees -- are more important than any specific type of cost.
ETFs are mutual funds

Fast-forward to the present-day situation with exchange-traded funds.

ETFs are mutual funds that trade like stocks. Rather than having all transactions made at the daily closing price, as happens with the vast majority of traditional funds, an ETF can be traded moment by moment. The build-out of the ETF business started with index funds, then went to leveraged index funds -- where the fund is built to deliver two or more times the daily return, or the inverse of the daily move -- and has recently added actively managed funds. (By comparison, the traditional fund world started with active management and didn't have indexing for about 50 years, and then added leveraged funds in the last decade, as ETFs were emerging.)

The indexed varieties of ETF have some cost and tax advantages over traditional funds, but they can also have some purchase hardships for the long-term regular investor. Where a consumer can plow, say, $100 a month into their traditional fund, they would pay brokerage commissions to make the move with ETFs; even cheap trades add up when the deposits are small, eroding the cost benefits.

The "fund or ETF" question facing investors has become a debate.

"The ETF industry doesn't need to pick a fight against funds, but it does need to educate the public to what ETFs are all about," Strauss said. "To this point, the industry has been using the easy ideas, but now is the time when people will decide if they want traditional funds, ETFs or both."

In short, this is about to become the next "load/no-load" debate, an off-topic discussion for most investors, who should instead be focused on buying the best investment structure and management for their needs.

These days, it's easy to find message boards and chat rooms where people say things like "Why use mutual funds when you can buy ETFs?" The truth, of course, is that an ETF is a mutual fund built on a different chassis. Actively managed ETFs will have all of the same pitfalls as an actively managed traditional fund, just with a different structure.

And just as studies showed that total costs mattered more than load structure, so must investors recognize that ETFs are only better when they are based on superior investment strategy. Even Strauss, now an ETF advocate, acknowledges that up to this point the ordinary investor has been "buying ETFs because they think they're better, so they will buy the East Afghanistan Lamb's Wool fund just because it's an ETF.

"It's better for everyone, including the ETF companies, if investors figure out how an ETF can really help them," Strauss said.

In short, the new trade group is about marketing. Just as the 100% No-Load Mutual Fund Council was for funds that wanted to differentiate themselves from the rest of the industry, so the ETF firms see some benefit from having a group where they are featured, rather than being just a part of the broader interests of the Investment Company Institute, the mutual-fund company trade association.

As the ETF world looks increasingly like the traditional fund part of the industry, let's hope investors will be able to see past the hype and remember that the underlying investments and management philosophy will always be the most important considerations in picking fund, no matter the structure.
Continue Reading...


Wall Street Week Ahead: Politics Overshadow Profits

0 komentar

Stocks could be in for a rough ride in the week ahead as a focus on political risk overshadows what is clearly an improving profit picture.

Oliver Quilla for CNBC.com
About a quarter of the S&P 500 companies report, but the emphasis will be on what goes on in Washington. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke faces a very tight confirmation vote later in the week, and President Obama delivers his State of the Union address Wednesday night. There is also a Fed meeting and several major economic reports, including fresh housing data and fourth quarter GDP.

So far, nearly 20 percent of the S&P 500 has reported and 78 percent of those companies have beaten estimates, according to Thomson Reuters. Yet, stocks ignored the positives and sold off in the worst selling spree since the market bottomed in early March.

The Dow lost 4.1 percent or 436 points for the week to end at 10,172, while the S&P 500 fell 3.9 percent to 1091. The S&P saw its worst three-day decline since March 9, but it is still up 61 percent since that day. The Dow had its worst week since March 6. Stocks fell, along with commodities, but the dollar rose, gaining 1.7 percent against the euro for the week, to a level of $1.4139.

Buyers also bid up Treasurys in a flight-to-safety trade, pushing yields lower on the 10-year to 3.597 percent and the 2-year to 0.813 percent, levels last seen Dec. 18. Click here for bond quotes.

Stocks Correcting?

"In the near term, we have some things going on here that could cause a correction," said investment strategist Richard Bernstein, CEO of Richard Bernstein Capital Management. "As we move out in 2010, I'm more reasonably bullish, and I think earnings growth could be better than people think."


"Whatever the correction is, 5, 10 percent, I would be a buyer on that correction. I just think it will be a bumpy ride, but you'll do pretty well this year. The surprise is the U.S. is going to do reasonably well relative to the rest of the world," he said. Bernstein said the rising dollar though is a risk to the rally since as it rises, commodities prices decline, taking the market leader, materials stocks, lower. Materials shares were the worst performers of the week, down 6.4 percent.

Stocks in the past week rode a roller coaster of emotion and fear. First, the market gained on expectations that Republican Scott Brown would win the Senate race in Massachusetts, shifting the balance of power in the Senate from a Democratic 60-seat stronghold. The Wall Street hope was that his election would create gridlock in Washington and prevent some Democratic referendums, like health care reform, from succeeding. He did win, but markets were overtaken by worries out of China that it is curbing bank lending in a bid to slow its economic growth, (and therefore the growth of the world economy). Click here for the latest business news from Asia.

Brown's victory was also seen as a backlash by voters toward the Obama Administration's policies and deficit spending. A new sense that Washington could pull in the purse strings added to the gains in the dollar.

Bernanke Under Fire

By Thursday though, the focus quickly shifted to the financial industry when President Obama declared reform measures that would limit the ability of major banks to participate in certain risky businesses. That news drove the shares of major banks and the stock market lower on Thursday, and by Friday, the tenure of the Fed chairman took center stage as some prominent Democrats said they would not endorse him for a second term.


Two Democratic senators facing re-election—Barbara Boxer of California and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin—were among those announcing their opposition to Bernanke.

Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader, late Friday announced his support for Bernanke and said he would schedule a vote late in the coming week. In all likelihood, Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn would step in to temporarily cover for Bernanke if he is not reappointed by the end of his term Jan. 31.

"If it's just a delay action, a signaling process, the impact won't last long," said Pimco senior strategist Tony Crescenzi. "If its because there's growing opposition behind the scenes, the markets might get more nervous."

"This would be happening in the context of a couple of weeks of news that 's affecting investor psyche. In the context of that, it would harm confidence with respect to U.S. assets," Crescenzi said.


Crescenzi said it would be a bad signal to markets if Bernanke is not reappointed. "There's a broader signal that would come with respect to government involvement ... that would be illuminated," he said. The focus in markets is heavily on sovereign debt risk. "The U.S. is such a large debtor. This would be a risky gambit by the Congress to consider such an action," he said.

"In the context of all that's happened it would be viewed as a negative. Ultimately in the long run, what would matter is that the U.S. gets its fiscal house in order because that's what's needed to preserve the value of the dollar. The question is whether these actions taken in Washington might be an overreach and harmful in the long term to the U.S. economy and the financial system," he said.

"I think it's significant. I would probably have been dismissive of the risk of Bernanke not being Fed Chairman until today," said Foreign Exchange Analytics strategist David Gilmore in an interview Friday. "With the way the Democrats are lining up, it looks like he could easily be short of votes. I think that's significant and it's a short term negative for the dollar, but I think there's a bigger story lining up."
Continue Reading...


RBS May Delay Sempra Sale after U.S. Trading Plans, Times Says

0 komentar

Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc may be forced to delay the sale of its stake in Sempra Commodities, as U.S. plans to curb proprietary trading would reduce Sempra’s revenues, the London-based Times reported.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. may seek to reduce the amount it pays for the business or walk away from a deal, the report said, citing unnamed financial sources.

JPMorgan is in exclusive talks to buy the stake, Reuters reported on Jan. 20.
Continue Reading...


 

Random Posts

Foreign exchange market
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Forex)
Page semi-protected
"Forex" redirects here. For the football club, see FC Forex Braşov.
Foreign exchange

Exchange rates
Currency band
Exchange rate
Exchange rate regime
Fixed exchange rate
Floating exchange rate
Linked exchange rate
Dollarization

Markets
Foreign exchange market
Futures exchange
Retail forex

Assets
Currency
Currency future
Non-deliverable forward
Forex swap
Currency swap
Foreign exchange option

Historical agreements
Bretton Woods Conference
Smithsonian Agreement
Plaza Accord
Louvre Accord

See also
Bureau de change / currency exchange (office)
Hard currency

The foreign exchange market (forex, FX, or currency market) is a global, worldwide decentralized financial market for trading currencies. Financial centers around the world function as anchors of trading between a wide range of different types of buyers and sellers around the clock, with the exception of weekends. The foreign exchange market determines the relative values of different currencies.[1]

The primary purpose of the foreign exchange is to assist international trade and investment, by allowing businesses to convert one currency to another currency. For example, it permits a US business to import British goods and pay Pound Sterling, even though the business' income is in US dollars. It also supports direct speculation in the value of currencies, and the carry trade, speculation on the change in interest rates in two currencies.[2]

In a typical foreign exchange transaction, a party purchases a quantity of one currency by paying a quantity of another currency. The modern foreign exchange market began forming during the 1970s after three decades of government restrictions on foreign exchange transactions (the Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial and financial relations among the world's major industrial states after World War II), when countries gradually switched to floating exchange rates from the previous exchange rate regime, which remained fixed as per the Bretton Woods system.

The foreign exchange market is unique because of

its huge trading volume representing the largest asset class in the world leading to high liquidity;
its geographical dispersion;
its continuous operation: 24 hours a day except weekends, i.e. trading from 20:15 GMT on Sunday until 22:00 GMT Friday;
the variety of factors that affect exchange rates;
the low margins of relative profit compared with other markets of fixed income; and
the use of leverage to enhance profit and loss margins and with respect to account size.

As such, it has been referred to as the market closest to the ideal of perfect competition, notwithstanding currency intervention by central banks. According to the Bank for International Settlements,[3] as of April 2010, average daily turnover in global foreign exchange markets is estimated at $3.98 trillion, a growth of approximately 20% over the $3.21 trillion daily volume as of April 2007. Some firms specializing on foreign exchange market had put the average daily turnover in excess of US$4 trillion.[4]

The $3.98 trillion break-down is as follows:

$1.490 trillion in spot transactions
$475 billion in outright forwards
$1.765 trillion in foreign exchange swaps
$43 billion Currency swaps
$207 billion in options and other products

Contents
[hide]

1 Market Size and liquidity
2 Market participants
2.1 Banks
2.2 Commercial companies
2.3 Central banks
2.4 Forex Fixing
2.5 Hedge funds as speculators
2.6 Investment management firms
2.7 Retail foreign exchange traders
2.8 Non-bank foreign exchange companies
2.9 Money transfer/remittance companies and bureaux de change
3 Trading characteristics
4 Determinants of FX rates
4.1 Economic factors
4.2 Political conditions
4.3 Market psychology
5 Financial instruments
5.1 Spot
5.2 Forward
5.3 Swap
5.4 Future
5.5 Option
6 Speculation
7 Risk aversion in forex
8 Further reading
9 See also
10 Notes
11 References
12 External links

Market Size and liquidity
Main foreign exchange market turnover, 1988–2007, measured in billions of USD.

The foreign exchange market is the most liquid financial market in the world. Traders include large banks, central banks, institutional investors, currency speculators, corporations, governments, other financial institutions, and retail investors. The average daily turnover in the global foreign exchange and related markets is continuously growing. According to the 2010 Triennial Central Bank Survey, coordinated by the Bank for International Settlements, average daily turnover was US$3.98 trillion in April 2010 (vs $1.7 trillion in 1998).[3] Of this $3.98 trillion, $1.5 trillion was spot foreign exchange transactions and $2.5 trillion was traded in outright forwards, FX swaps and other currency derivatives.

Trading in the UK accounted for 36.7% of the total, making UK by far the most important global center for foreign exchange trading. In second and third places, respectively, trading in the USA accounted for 17.9%, and Japan accounted for 6.2%.[5]

Turnover of exchange-traded foreign exchange futures and options have grown rapidly in recent years, reaching $166 billion in April 2010 (double the turnover recorded in April 2007). Exchange-traded currency derivatives represent 4% of OTC foreign exchange turnover. FX futures contracts were introduced in 1972 at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and are actively traded relative to most other futures contracts.

Most developed countries permit the trading of FX derivative products (like currency futures and options on currency futures) on their exchanges. All these developed countries already have fully convertible capital accounts. A number of emerging countries do not permit FX derivative products on their exchanges in view of controls on the capital accounts. The use of foreign exchange derivatives is growing in many emerging economies.[6] Countries such as Korea, South Africa, and India have established currency futures exchanges, despite having some controls on the capital account.
Top 10 currency traders [7]
% of overall volume, May 2011 Rank Name Market share
1 Germany Deutsche Bank 15.64%
2 United Kingdom Barclays Capital 10.75%
3 Switzerland UBS AG 10.59%
4 United States Citi 8.88%
5 United States JPMorgan 6.43%
6 United Kingdom HSBC 6.26%
7 United Kingdom Royal Bank of Scotland 6.20%
8 Switzerland Credit Suisse 4.80%
9 United States Goldman Sachs 4.13%
10 United States Morgan Stanley 3.64%

Foreign exchange trading increased by 20% between April 2007 and April 2010 and has more than doubled since 2004.[8] The increase in turnover is due to a number of factors: the growing importance of foreign exchange as an asset class, the increased trading activity of high-frequency traders, and the emergence of retail investors as an important market segment. The growth of electronic execution methods and the diverse selection of execution venues have lowered transaction costs, increased market liquidity, and attracted greater participation from many customer types. In particular, electronic trading via online portals has made it easier for retail traders to trade in the foreign exchange market. By 2010, retail trading is estimated to account for up to 10% of spot FX turnover, or $150 billion per day (see retail trading platforms).

Because foreign exchange is an OTC market where brokers/dealers negotiate directly with one another, there is no central exchange or clearing house. The biggest geographic trading center is the UK, primarily London, which according to TheCityUK estimates has increased its share of global turnover in traditional transactions from 34.6% in April 2007 to 36.7% in April 2010. Due to London's dominance in the market, a particular currency's quoted price is usually the London market price. For instance, when the IMF calculates the value of its SDRs every day, they use the London market prices at noon that day.
Market participants
Financial markets

Bruxelles Bourse.jpg

Public market

Exchange
Securities
Bond market

Fixed income
Corporate bond
Government bond
Municipal bond
Bond valuation
High-yield debt
Stock market

Stock
Preferred stock
Common stock
Registered share
Voting share
Stock exchange
Derivatives market

Securitization
Hybrid security
Credit derivative
Futures exchange
OTC, non organized

Spot market
Forwards
Swaps
Options
Foreign exchange

Exchange rate
Currency
Other markets

Money market
Reinsurance market
Commodity market
Real estate market
Practical trading

Participants
Clearing house
Financial regulation

Finance series
Banks and banking
Corporate finance
Personal finance
Public finance
v · d · e

Unlike a stock market, the foreign exchange market is divided into levels of access. At the top is the inter-bank market, which is made up of the largest commercial banks and securities dealers. Within the inter-bank market, spreads, which are the difference between the bid and ask prices, are razor sharp and not known to players outside the inner circle. The difference between the bid and ask prices widens (for example from 0-1 pip to 1-2 pips for a currencies such as the EUR) as you go down the levels of access. This is due to volume. If a trader can guarantee large numbers of transactions for large amounts, they can demand a smaller difference between the bid and ask price, which is referred to as a better spread. The levels of access that make up the foreign exchange market are determined by the size of the "line" (the amount of money with which they are trading). The top-tier interbank market accounts for 53% of all transactions. From there, smaller banks, followed by large multi-national corporations (which need to hedge risk and pay employees in different countries), large hedge funds, and even some of the retail FX market makers. According to Galati and Melvin, “Pension funds, insurance companies, mutual funds, and other institutional investors have played an increasingly important role in financial markets in general, and in FX markets in particular, since the early 2000s.” (2004) In addition, he notes, “Hedge funds have grown markedly over the 2001–2004 period in terms of both number and overall size”.[9] Central banks also participate in the foreign exchange market to align currencies to their economic needs.
Banks

The interbank market caters for both the majority of commercial turnover and large amounts of speculative trading every day. Many large banks may trade billions of dollars, daily. Some of this trading is undertaken on behalf of customers, but much is conducted by proprietary desks, which are trading desks for the bank's own account. Until recently, foreign exchange brokers did large amounts of business, facilitating interbank trading and matching anonymous counterparts for large fees. Today, however, much of this business has moved on to more efficient electronic systems. The broker squawk box lets traders listen in on ongoing interbank trading and is heard in most trading rooms, but turnover is noticeably smaller than just a few years ago.[citation needed]
Commercial companies

An important part of this market comes from the financial activities of companies seeking foreign exchange to pay for goods or services. Commercial companies often trade fairly small amounts compared to those of banks or speculators, and their trades often have little short term impact on market rates. Nevertheless, trade flows are an important factor in the long-term direction of a currency's exchange rate. Some multinational companies can have an unpredictable impact when very large positions are covered due to exposures that are not widely known by other market participants.
Central banks

National central banks play an important role in the foreign exchange markets. They try to control the money supply, inflation, and/or interest rates and often have official or unofficial target rates for their currencies. They can use their often substantial foreign exchange reserves to stabilize the market. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of central bank "stabilizing speculation" is doubtful because central banks do not go bankrupt if they make large losses, like other traders would, and there is no convincing evidence that they do make a profit trading.
Forex Fixing

Forex fixing is the daily monetary exchange rate fixed by the national bank of each country. The idea is that central banks use the fixing time and exchange rate to evaluate behavior of their currency. Fixing exchange rates reflects the real value of equilibrium in the forex market. Banks, dealers and online foreign exchange traders use fixing rates as a trend indicator.

The mere expectation or rumor of central bank intervention might be enough to stabilize a currency, but aggressive intervention might be used several times each year in countries with a dirty float currency regime. Central banks do not always achieve their objectives. The combined resources of the market can easily overwhelm any central bank.[10] Several scenarios of this nature were seen in the 1992–93 ERM collapse, and in more recent times in Southeast Asia.
Hedge funds as speculators

About 70% to 90%[citation needed] of the foreign exchange transactions are speculative. In other words, the person or institution that bought or sold the currency has no plan to actually take delivery of the currency in the end; rather, they were solely speculating on the movement of that particular currency. Hedge funds have gained a reputation for aggressive currency speculation since 1996. They control billions of dollars of equity and may borrow billions more, and thus may overwhelm intervention by central banks to support almost any currency, if the economic fundamentals are in the hedge funds' favor.
Investment management firms

Investment management firms (who typically manage large accounts on behalf of customers such as pension funds and endowments) use the foreign exchange market to facilitate transactions in foreign securities. For example, an investment manager bearing an international equity portfolio needs to purchase and sell several pairs of foreign currencies to pay for foreign securities purchases.

Some investment management firms also have more speculative specialist currency overlay operations, which manage clients' currency exposures with the aim of generating profits as well as limiting risk. Whilst the number of this type of specialist firms is quite small, many have a large value of assets under management (AUM), and hence can generate large trades.
Retail foreign exchange traders

Individual Retail speculative traders constitute a growing segment of this market with the advent of retail forex platforms, both in size and importance. Currently, they participate indirectly through brokers or banks. Retail brokers, while largely controlled and regulated in the USA by the CFTC and NFA have in the past been subjected to periodic foreign exchange scams.[11][12] To deal with the issue, the NFA and CFTC began (as of 2009) imposing stricter requirements, particularly in relation to the amount of Net Capitalization required of its members. As a result many of the smaller and perhaps questionable brokers are now gone or have moved to countries outside the US. A number of the forex brokers operate from the UK under FSA regulations where forex trading using margin is part of the wider over-the-counter derivatives trading industry that includes CFDs and financial spread betting.

There are two main types of retail FX brokers offering the opportunity for speculative currency trading: brokers and dealers or market makers. Brokers serve as an agent of the customer in the broader FX market, by seeking the best price in the market for a retail order and dealing on behalf of the retail customer. They charge a commission or mark-up in addition to the price obtained in the market. Dealers or market makers, by contrast, typically act as principal in the transaction versus the retail customer, and quote a price they are willing to deal at.
Non-bank foreign exchange companies

Non-bank foreign exchange companies offer currency exchange and international payments to private individuals and companies. These are also known as foreign exchange brokers but are distinct in that they do not offer speculative trading but rather currency exchange with payments (i.e., there is usually a physical delivery of currency to a bank account).

It is estimated that in the UK, 14% of currency transfers/payments[13] are made via Foreign Exchange Companies.[14] These companies' selling point is usually that they will offer better exchange rates or cheaper payments than the customer's bank. These companies differ from Money Transfer/Remittance Companies in that they generally offer higher-value services.
Money transfer/remittance companies and bureaux de change

Money transfer companies/remittance companies perform high-volume low-value transfers generally by economic migrants back to their home country. In 2007, the Aite Group estimated that there were $369 billion of remittances (an increase of 8% on the previous year). The four largest markets (India, China, Mexico and the Philippines) receive $95 billion. The largest and best known provider is Western Union with 345,000 agents globally followed by UAE Exchange[citation needed]

Bureau de change or currency transfer companies provide low value foreign exchange services for travelers. These are typically located at airports and stations or at tourist locations and allow physical notes to be exchanged from one currency to another. They access the foreign exchange markets via banks or non bank foreign exchange companies.
Trading characteristics
Most traded currencies by value
Currency distribution of global foreign exchange market turnover[3] Rank Currency ISO 4217 code
(Symbol) % daily share
(April 2010)
1
United States United States dollar
USD ($)
84.9%
2
European Union Euro
EUR (€)
39.1%
3
Japan Japanese yen
JPY (¥)
19.0%
4
United Kingdom Pound sterling
GBP (£)
12.9%
5
Australia Australian dollar
AUD ($)
7.6%
6
Switzerland Swiss franc
CHF (Fr)
6.4%
7
Canada Canadian dollar
CAD ($)
5.3%
8
Hong Kong Hong Kong dollar
HKD ($)
2.4%
9
Sweden Swedish krona
SEK (kr)
2.2%
10
New Zealand New Zealand dollar
NZD ($)
1.6%
11
South Korea South Korean won
KRW (₩)
1.5%
12
Singapore Singapore dollar
SGD ($)
1.4%
13
Norway Norwegian krone
NOK (kr)
1.3%
14
Mexico Mexican peso
MXN ($)
1.3%
15
India Indian rupee
INR (Indian Rupee symbol.svg)
0.9%
Other 12.2%
Total[15] 200%

There is no unified or centrally cleared market for the majority of FX trades, and there is very little cross-border regulation. Due to the over-the-counter (OTC) nature of currency markets, there are rather a number of interconnected marketplaces, where different currencies instruments are traded. This implies that there is not a single exchange rate but rather a number of different rates (prices), depending on what bank or market maker is trading, and where it is. In practice the rates are often very close, otherwise they could be exploited by arbitrageurs instantaneously. Due to London's dominance in the market, a particular currency's quoted price is usually the London market price. A joint venture of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Reuters, called Fxmarketspace opened in 2007 and aspired but failed to the role of a central market clearing mechanism.[citation needed]

The main trading center is London, but New York, Tokyo, Hong Kong and Singapore are all important centers as well. Banks throughout the world participate. Currency trading happens continuously throughout the day; as the Asian trading session ends, the European session begins, followed by the North American session and then back to the Asian session, excluding weekends.

Fluctuations in exchange rates are usually caused by actual monetary flows as well as by expectations of changes in monetary flows caused by changes in gross domestic product (GDP) growth, inflation (purchasing power parity theory), interest rates (interest rate parity, Domestic Fisher effect, International Fisher effect), budget and trade deficits or surpluses, large cross-border M&A deals and other macroeconomic conditions. Major news is released publicly, often on scheduled dates, so many people have access to the same news at the same time. However, the large banks have an important advantage; they can see their customers' order flow.

Currencies are traded against one another. Each currency pair thus constitutes an individual trading product and is traditionally noted XXXYYY or XXX/YYY, where XXX and YYY are the ISO 4217 international three-letter code of the currencies involved. The first currency (XXX) is the base currency that is quoted relative to the second currency (YYY), called the counter currency (or quote currency). For instance, the quotation EURUSD (EUR/USD) 1.5465 is the price of the euro expressed in US dollars, meaning 1 euro = 1.5465 dollars. The market convention is to quote most exchange rates against the USD with the US dollar as the base currency (e.g. USDJPY, USDCAD, USDCHF). The exceptions are the British pound (GBP), Australian dollar (AUD), the New Zealand dollar (NZD) and the euro (EUR) where the USD is the counter currency (e.g. GBPUSD, AUDUSD, NZDUSD, EURUSD).

The factors affecting XXX will affect both XXXYYY and XXXZZZ. This causes positive currency correlation between XXXYYY and XXXZZZ.

On the spot market, according to the 2010 Triennial Survey, the most heavily traded bilateral currency pairs were:

EURUSD: 28%
USDJPY: 14%
GBPUSD (also called cable): 9%

and the US currency was involved in 84.9% of transactions, followed by the euro (39.1%), the yen (19.0%), and sterling (12.9%) (see table). Volume percentages for all individual currencies should add up to 200%, as each transaction involves two currencies.

Trading in the euro has grown considerably since the currency's creation in January 1999, and how long the foreign exchange market will remain dollar-centered is open to debate. Until recently, trading the euro versus a non-European currency ZZZ would have usually involved two trades: EURUSD and USDZZZ. The exception to this is EURJPY, which is an established traded currency pair in the interbank spot market. As the dollar's value has eroded during 2008, interest in using the euro as reference currency for prices in commodities (such as oil), as well as a larger component of foreign reserves by banks, has increased dramatically. Transactions in the currencies of commodity-producing countries, such as AUD, NZD, CAD, have also increased.
Determinants of FX rates
See also: exchange rates

The following theories explain the fluctuations in FX rates in a floating exchange rate regime (In a fixed exchange rate regime, FX rates are decided by its government):

(a) International parity conditions: Relative Purchasing Power Parity, interest rate parity, Domestic Fisher effect, International Fisher effect. Though to some extent the above theories provide logical explanation for the fluctuations in exchange rates, yet these theories falter as they are based on challengeable assumptions [e.g., free flow of goods, services and capital] which seldom hold true in the real world.

(b) Balance of payments model (see exchange rate): This model, however, focuses largely on tradable goods and services, ignoring the increasing role of global capital flows. It failed to provide any explanation for continuous appreciation of dollar during 1980s and most part of 1990s in face of soaring US current account deficit.

(c) Asset market model (see exchange rate): views currencies as an important asset class for constructing investment portfolios. Assets prices are influenced mostly by people's willingness to hold the existing quantities of assets, which in turn depends on their expectations on the future worth of these assets. The asset market model of exchange rate determination states that “the exchange rate between two currencies represents the price that just balances the relative supplies of, and demand for, assets denominated in those currencies.”

None of the models developed so far succeed to explain FX rates levels and volatility in the longer time frames. For shorter time frames (less than a few days) algorithms can be devised to predict prices. It is understood from the above models that many macroeconomic factors affect the exchange rates and in the end currency prices are a result of dual forces of demand and supply. The world's currency markets can be viewed as a huge melting pot: in a large and ever-changing mix of current events, supply and demand factors are constantly shifting, and the price of one currency in relation to another shifts accordingly. No other market encompasses (and distills) as much of what is going on in the world at any given time as foreign exchange.

Supply and demand for any given currency, and thus its value, are not influenced by any single element, but rather by several. These elements generally fall into three categories: economic factors, political conditions and market psychology.
Economic factors

These include: (a)economic policy, disseminated by government agencies and central banks, (b)economic conditions, generally revealed through economic reports, and other economic indicators.

Economic policy comprises government fiscal policy (budget/spending practices) and monetary policy (the means by which a government's central bank influences the supply and "cost" of money, which is reflected by the level of interest rates).
Government budget deficits or surpluses: The market usually reacts negatively to widening government budget deficits, and positively to narrowing budget deficits. The impact is reflected in the value of a country's currency.
Balance of trade levels and trends: The trade flow between countries illustrates the demand for goods and services, which in turn indicates demand for a country's currency to conduct trade. Surpluses and deficits in trade of goods and services reflect the competitiveness of a nation's economy. For example, trade deficits may have a negative impact on a nation's currency.
Inflation levels and trends: Typically a currency will lose value if there is a high level of inflation in the country or if inflation levels are perceived to be rising. This is because inflation erodes purchasing power, thus demand, for that particular currency. However, a currency may sometimes strengthen when inflation rises because of expectations that the central bank will raise short-term interest rates to combat rising inflation.
Economic growth and health: Reports such as GDP, employment levels, retail sales, capacity utilization and others, detail the levels of a country's economic growth and health. Generally, the more healthy and robust a country's economy, the better its currency will perform, and the more demand for it there will be.
Productivity of an economy: Increasing productivity in an economy should positively influence the value of its currency. Its effects are more prominent if the increase is in the traded sector [1].

Political conditions

Internal, regional, and international political conditions and events can have a profound effect on currency markets.

All exchange rates are susceptible to political instability and anticipations about the new ruling party. Political upheaval and instability can have a negative impact on a nation's economy. For example, destabilization of coalition governments in Pakistan and Thailand can negatively affect the value of their currencies. Similarly, in a country experiencing financial difficulties, the rise of a political faction that is perceived to be fiscally responsible can have the opposite effect. Also, events in one country in a region may spur positive/negative interest in a neighboring country and, in the process, affect its currency.
Market psychology

Market psychology and trader perceptions influence the foreign exchange market in a variety of ways:

Flights to quality: Unsettling international events can lead to a "flight to quality", a type of capital flight whereby investors move their assets to a perceived "safe haven". There will be a greater demand, thus a higher price, for currencies perceived as stronger over their relatively weaker counterparts. The U.S. dollar, Swiss franc and gold have been traditional safe havens during times of political or economic uncertainty.[16]
Long-term trends: Currency markets often move in visible long-term trends. Although currencies do not have an annual growing season like physical commodities, business cycles do make themselves felt. Cycle analysis looks at longer-term price trends that may rise from economic or political trends.[17]
"Buy the rumor, sell the fact": This market truism can apply to many currency situations. It is the tendency for the price of a currency to reflect the impact of a particular action before it occurs and, when the anticipated event comes to pass, react in exactly the opposite direction. This may also be referred to as a market being "oversold" or "overbought".[18] To buy the rumor or sell the fact can also be an example of the cognitive bias known as anchoring, when investors focus too much on the relevance of outside events to currency prices.
Economic numbers: While economic numbers can certainly reflect economic policy, some reports and numbers take on a talisman-like effect: the number itself becomes important to market psychology and may have an immediate impact on short-term market moves. "What to watch" can change over time. In recent years, for example, money supply, employment, trade balance figures and inflation numbers have all taken turns in the spotlight.
Technical trading considerations: As in other markets, the accumulated price movements in a currency pair such as EUR/USD can form apparent patterns that traders may attempt to use. Many traders study price charts in order to identify such patterns.[19]

Financial instruments
Spot

A spot transaction is a two-day delivery transaction (except in the case of trades between the US Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Turkish Lira, EURO and Russian Ruble, which settle the next business day), as opposed to the futures contracts, which are usually three months. This trade represents a “direct exchange” between two currencies, has the shortest time frame, involves cash rather than a contract; and interest is not included in the agreed-upon transaction.
Forward
See also: forward contract

One way to deal with the foreign exchange risk is to engage in a forward transaction. In this transaction, money does not actually change hands until some agreed upon future date. A buyer and seller agree on an exchange rate for any date in the future, and the transaction occurs on that date, regardless of what the market rates are then. The duration of the trade can be one day, a few days, months or years. Usually the date is decided by both parties. Then the forward contract is negotiated and agreed upon by both parties.
Swap
Main article: foreign exchange swap

The most common type of forward transaction is the FX swap. In an FX swap, two parties exchange currencies for a certain length of time and agree to reverse the transaction at a later date. These are not standardized contracts and are not traded through an exchange.
Future
Main article: currency future

Futures are standardized and are usually traded on an exchange created for this purpose. The average contract length is roughly 3 months. Futures contracts are usually inclusive of any interest amounts.
Option
Main article: foreign exchange option

A foreign exchange option (commonly shortened to just FX option) is a derivative where the owner has the right but not the obligation to exchange money denominated in one currency into another currency at a pre-agreed exchange rate on a specified date. The FX options market is the deepest, largest and most liquid market for options of any kind in the world.
Speculation

Controversy about currency speculators and their effect on currency devaluations and national economies recurs regularly. Nevertheless, economists including Milton Friedman have argued that speculators ultimately are a stabilizing influence on the market and perform the important function of providing a market for hedgers and transferring risk from those people who don't wish to bear it, to those who do.[20] Other economists such as Joseph Stiglitz consider this argument to be based more on politics and a free market philosophy than on economics.[21]

Large hedge funds and other well capitalized "position traders" are the main professional speculators. According to some economists, individual traders could act as "noise traders" and have a more destabilizing role than larger and better informed actors.[22]

Currency speculation is considered a highly suspect activity in many countries.[where?] While investment in traditional financial instruments like bonds or stocks often is considered to contribute positively to economic growth by providing capital, currency speculation does not; according to this view, it is simply gambling that often interferes with economic policy. For example, in 1992, currency speculation forced the Central Bank of Sweden to raise interest rates for a few days to 500% per annum, and later to devalue the krona.[23] Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is one well known proponent of this view. He blamed the devaluation of the Malaysian ringgit in 1997 on George Soros and other speculators.

Gregory J. Millman reports on an opposing view, comparing speculators to "vigilantes" who simply help "enforce" international agreements and anticipate the effects of basic economic "laws" in order to profit.[24]

In this view, countries may develop unsustainable financial bubbles or otherwise mishandle their national economies, and foreign exchange speculators made the inevitable collapse happen sooner. A relatively quick collapse might even be preferable to continued economic mishandling, followed by an eventual, larger, collapse. Mahathir Mohamad and other critics of speculation are viewed as trying to deflect the blame from themselves for having caused the unsustainable economic conditions.
Risk aversion in forex
See also: Safe-haven currency
Fig.1 Chart showing MSCI World Index of Equities fell while the US Dollar Index rose.

Risk aversion in the forex is a kind of trading behavior exhibited by the foreign exchange market when a potentially adverse event happens which may affect market conditions. This behavior is caused when risk averse traders liquidate their positions in risky assets and shift the funds to less risky assets due to uncertainty.[25]

In the context of the forex market, traders liquidate their positions in various currencies to take up positions in safe-haven currencies, such as the US Dollar.[26] Sometimes, the choice of a safe haven currency is more of a choice based on prevailing sentiments rather than one of economic statistics. An example would be the Financial Crisis of 2008. The value of equities across world fell while the US Dollar strengthened (see Fig.1). This happened despite the strong focus of the crisis in the USA.[27]
Further reading

The National Futures Association (2010). Trading in the Retail Off-Exchange Foreign Currency Market. Chicago, Illinois.


See also

Balance of trade
Bretton Woods system
Currency codes
Currency pair
Currency strength
Foreign currency mortgage



Foreign exchange autotrading
Foreign exchange controls
Foreign exchange hedge
Foreign exchange reserves
Foreign exchange scam
Foreign exchange swap



Money market
Nonfarm payrolls
Special Drawing Rights
Tobin Tax
World currency






Notes
References

^ The Economist – Guide to the Financial Markets (pdf)
^ Global imbalances and destabilizing speculation (2007), UNCTAD Trade and development report 2007 (Chapter 1B).
^ a b c 2010 Triennial Central Bank Survey, Bank for International Settlements.
^ "What is Foreign Exchange?". Published by the International Business Times AU. Retrieved: February 11, 2011.
^ BIS Triennial Central Bank Survey, published in September 2010.
^ "Derivatives in emerging markets", the Bank for International Settlements, December 13, 2010
^ Source: Euromoney FX survey FX survey 2011: The Euromoney FX survey is the largest global poll of foreign exchange service providers.'
^ "The $4 trillion question: what explains FX growth since the 2007 survey?, the Bank for International Settlements, December 13, 2010
^ Gabriele Galati, Michael Melvin (December 2004). "Why has FX trading surged? Explaining the 2004 triennial survey". Bank for International Settlements.
^ Alan Greenspan, The Roots of the Mortgage Crisis: Bubbles cannot be safely defused by monetary policy before the speculative fever breaks on its own. , the Wall Street Journal, December 12, 2007
^ McKay, Peter A. (2005-07-26). "Scammers Operating on Periphery Of CFTC's Domain Lure Little Guy With Fantastic Promises of Profits". The Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones and Company). Retrieved 2007-10-31.
^ Egan, Jack (2005-06-19). "Check the Currency Risk. Then Multiply by 100". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-10-30.
^ The Sunday Times (UK), 16 July 2006
^ The 5 largest in the UK are Travelex, Moneycorp, HiFX, World First and Currencies Direct
^ The total sum is 200% because each currency trade always involves a currency pair.
^ Safe haven currency
^ John J. Murphy, Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets (New York Institute of Finance, 1999), pp. 343–375.
^ Investopedia
^ Sam Y. Cross, All About the Foreign Exchange Market in the United States, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (1998), chapter 11, pp. 113–115.
^ Michael A. S. Guth, "Profitable Destabilizing Speculation," Chapter 1 in Michael A. S. Guth, Speculative behavior and the operation of competitive markets under uncertainty, Avebury Ashgate Publishing, Aldorshot, England (1994), ISBN 1856289850.
^ What I Learned at the World Economic Crisis Joseph Stiglitz, The New Republic, April 17, 2000, reprinted at GlobalPolicy.org
^ Summers LH and Summers VP (1989) 'When financial markets work too well: a Cautious case for a securities transaction tax' Journal of financial services
^ But Don't Rush Out to Buy Kronor: Sweden's 500% Gamble - International Herald Tribune
^ Gregory J. Millman, Around the World on a Trillion Dollars a Day, Bantam Press, New York, 1995.
^ "Risk Averse". Investopedia. Retrieved 2010-02-25.
^ "Global markets-US stocks rebound, dollar gains on risk aversion". Reuters. 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2010-02-27.
^ Stewart, Heather (2008-04-09). "IMF says US crisis is 'largest financial shock since Great Depression'". London: guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-02-27.


About Template

Return to top of page Copyright © 2010 | Flash News Converted into Blogger Template by HackTutors